Menu

Unit 21: Potential, Potential Difference and Potential Energy

Physics - Class 11

This chapter explores the concepts of electric potential, potential difference, and potential energy, detailing their definitions, mathematical relationships, and physical interpretations. It covers equipotential surfaces, potential gradient, and provides numerous examples and problem‑solving strategies.

No MCQ questions available for this chapter.

Unit 21: Potential, Potential Difference and Potential Energy

Introduction

Electrostatics deals with electric charges at rest. While Coulomb’s law gives the force between two point charges, it is often more convenient to work with scalar quantities such as electric potential and potential energy. These quantities simplify the analysis of fields, work, and energy transformations in electrostatic systems. In this chapter we develop the ideas of potential difference, electric potential, potential energy of charge configurations, equipotential surfaces, and the relationship between potential gradient and electric field. Each concept is introduced with a clear definition, the relevant formula, variable explanations, and illustrative numerical examples suitable for a Class 11 physics student.

1. Potential Difference and Electric Potential

Definition of Potential Difference

The potential difference (also called voltage) between two points A and B is defined as the work done per unit charge in moving a test charge from A to B without acceleration. Mathematically:

V_{AB} = \frac{W_{AB}}{q} where: W is the work done by an external agent (in joules, J) to move the charge q (in coulombs, C) from A to B, and V is the potential difference (in volts, V).

If the work done by the electric field is considered, the sign reverses, but the magnitude remains the same.

Example 1.1

How much work is required to move a charge of 2 µC (microcoulombs) across a potential difference of 12 V?

Using W = qV:

W = (2 × 10^{-6}\,C)(12\,V) = 2.4 × 10^{-5}\,J = 24 µJ.

Thus, 24 µJ of work must be supplied.

Electric Potential due to a Point Charge

The electric potential V at a distance r from a point charge q is obtained by integrating the work done against the field of q. The result is:

V = \frac{k q}{r}

where:

  • k = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \approx 8.99 × 10^{9}\,N·m^{2}/C^{2} (Coulomb’s constant),
  • q is the source charge (C),
  • r is the radial distance from the charge (m).

Potential is a scalar; the sign of q determines whether V is positive (positive charge) or negative (negative charge).

Example 1.2

Calculate the electric potential at a point 0.30 m from a charge of +5 µC.

V = (8.99 × 10^{9}) × (5 × 10^{-6}) / 0.30

V ≈ (44.95 × 10^{3}) / 0.30 ≈ 1.50 × 10^{5}\,V = 150 kV.

The potential is positive because the source charge is positive.

Scalar Nature and Units

Unlike the electric field, which is a vector, electric potential is a scalar quantity. This means potentials from multiple charges add algebraically (superposition). The SI unit of potential is the volt (V), defined as:

1 V = 1 J/C

Thus, a potential difference of 1 V does 1 joule of work on a charge of 1 coulomb.

2. Electric Potential Energy

Potential Energy of Two Point Charges

The electrostatic potential energy U of a system of two point charges q₁ and q₂ separated by distance r is the work required to bring the charges from infinity to that separation (assuming they start at rest far apart). The expression is:

U = \frac{k q_{1} q_{2}}{r}

Sign conventions:

  • If q₁ and q₂ have the same sign, U > 0 (repulsive interaction; energy must be supplied to bring them together).
  • If the signs are opposite, U < 0 (attractive interaction; the system releases energy as the charges approach).

Example 2.1

Find the potential energy of two charges, q₁ = +3 µC and q₂ = –4 µC, placed 0.20 m apart.

U = (8.99 × 10^{9}) × (3 × 10^{-6}) × (-4 × 10^{-6}) / 0.20

U = (8.99 × 10^{9}) × (-12 × 10^{-12}) / 0.20

U ≈ (-107.88 × 10^{-3}) / 0.20 ≈ -0.539 J.

The negative sign indicates that the system is bound; 0.54 J would be released if the charges were allowed to come together from infinity.

Potential Energy of a Charge in an Electric Potential

When a charge q is placed in a region where the electric potential is V, its potential energy is simply:

U = q V

This follows directly from the definition of potential difference: moving the charge from a reference point (where V = 0) to the point of interest requires work W = qΔV = qV.

Example 2.2

An electron (charge –e = –1.602 × 10^{-19} C) is moved from a point at 0 V to a point at +250 V. What is its change in potential energy?

ΔU = q ΔV = (-1.602 × 10^{-19} C)(250 V) = -4.005 × 10^{-17} J.

The electron loses potential energy (becomes more negative) as it moves to a higher potential because its charge is negative.

Electron Volt (eV)

In atomic and particle physics, energies are often expressed in electron volts. One electron volt is defined as the kinetic energy gained by an electron when it accelerates through a potential difference of exactly 1 V.

1 eV = (1.602 × 10^{-19} C)(1 V) = 1.602 × 10^{-19} J

Conversely, 1 J = 6.242 × 10^{18} eV.

Example 2.3

Convert an energy of 12 keV (kilo‑electron‑volts) to joules.

12 keV = 12 × 10^{3} eV = 12 000 eV

E = 12 000 × 1.602 × 10^{-19} J ≈ 1.922 × 10^{-15} J.

3. Equipotential Lines and Surfaces

Concept

An equipotential surface (or line in two dimensions) is a collection of points that share the same electric potential. Moving a test charge anywhere on such a surface requires no net work because the potential difference between any two points on the surface is zero.

Properties of Equipotential Surfaces

  1. Perpendicularity to Electric Field: The electric field vector \(\vec{E}\) is always perpendicular (normal) to an equipotential surface. If a component of \(\vec{E}\) existed tangent to the surface, it would do work moving a charge along the surface, contradicting the definition of equipotential.
  2. Zero Work Done: Since ΔV = 0 on an equipotential, the work W = qΔV = 0 for any charge moved along it.
  3. Shape for a Point Charge: For an isolated point charge, equipotential surfaces are concentric spheres centered on the charge. In a cross‑section they appear as circles.
  4. Never Intersect: Two different equipotential surfaces cannot intersect, because a point cannot have two distinct potentials simultaneously.

Example 3.1 – Point Charge

Consider a +2 µC charge at the origin. The equipotential sphere of radius r = 0.10 m corresponds to a potential:

V = kq/r = (8.99 × 10^{9})(2 × 10^{-6})/0.10 ≈ 1.80 × 10^{5} V.

All points on that sphere share this value.

Example 3.2 – Electric Dipole

For a dipole consisting of charges +q and –q separated by distance d, the equipotential lines in the plane containing the dipole are more complex. Near the midpoint, they resemble distorted circles that become elongated along the axis of the dipole. Far away, the dipole’s potential falls off as 1/r², and equipotentials approach those of a point charge of zero net charge (i.e., they become more spherical).

Sketching these lines helps visualize why the electric field lines (which are perpendicular) emerge from the positive charge and terminate on the negative charge.

4. Potential Gradient and Its Relation to Electric Field

Definition of Potential Gradient

The potential gradient describes how rapidly the electric potential changes with position. In one dimension along the x‑axis it is defined as:

\frac{dV}{dx}

Its SI unit is volt per metre (V/m). In three dimensions the gradient is a vector:

\(\nabla V = \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial V}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial V}{\partial z}\right)\)

Relation to Electric Field

The electric field is the negative gradient of the potential:

\(\vec{E} = - \nabla V\)

In radial coordinates for a spherically symmetric potential V(r):

E_{r} = -\frac{dV}{dr}

The minus sign indicates that the electric field points in the direction of decreasing potential (from high to low V).

Units Consistency

Since V is measured in volts and distance in metres, V/m is equivalent to newton per coulomb (N/C), confirming that both expressions for E have the same unit.

Example 4.1 – Point Charge

For a point charge q, the potential is V(r) = kq/r. Differentiate:

\frac{dV}{dr} = -\frac{kq}{r^{2}}

Hence the radial electric field magnitude is:

E = -\frac{dV}{dr} = \frac{kq}{r^{2}}

which matches Coulomb’s law for the field of a point charge.

Example 4.2 – Uniform Field

In a uniform electric field E₀ directed along the +x axis, the potential varies linearly: V(x) = –E₀ x + C (where C is a constant). The gradient is:

\frac{dV}{dx} = -E₀

Thus E = -dV/dx = E₀, as expected.

5. Worked Examples and Problem‑Solving Strategies

To solidify understanding, we solve a few representative problems that combine the concepts discussed.

Problem 5.1 – Potential of a Charge Array

Three charges are placed at the corners of an equilateral triangle of side 0.15 m: q₁ = +4 µC at the top, q₂ = –3 µC at the bottom‑left, q₃ = +2 µC at the bottom‑right. Find the electric potential at the centroid of the triangle.

Solution:

  1. Determine the distance from each corner to the centroid. For an equilateral triangle, the centroid is at a distance r = \frac{a}{\sqrt{3}} from each vertex, where a = side length.
  2. r = 0.15 / √3 ≈ 0.0866 m.
  3. Compute the potential due to each charge using V = kq/r and add algebraically:
    • V₁ = (8.99 × 10⁹)(4 × 10⁻⁶)/0.0866 ≈ 4.15 × 10⁵ V
    • V₂ = (8.99 × 10⁹)(–3 × 10⁻⁶)/0.0866 ≈ –3.11 × 10⁵ V
    • V₃ = (8.99 × 10⁹)(2 × 10⁻⁶)/0.0866 ≈ 2.07 × 10⁵ V
  4. Sum: V_total ≈ (4.15 – 3.11 + 2.07) × 10⁵ V ≈ 3.11 × 10⁵ V = 311 kV.

The positive net potential indicates that the positive charges dominate at the centroid.

Problem 5.2 – Work to Assemble a Charge Configuration

Calculate the work required to bring three charges, q₁ = +1 µC, q₂ = +2 µC, q₃ = +3 µC, from infinity to the vertices of an equilateral triangle of side 0.10 m.

Solution: The total work equals the sum of the potential energies of each pair (since bringing the first charge costs no work).

Pair distances are all 0.10 m.

  • U₁₂ = k q₁ q₂ / r = (8.99 × 10⁹)(1 × 10⁻⁶)(2 × 10⁻⁶)/0.10 ≈ 0.1798 J
  • U₁₃ = k q₁ q₃ / r = (8.99 × 10⁹)(1 × 10⁻⁶)(3 × 10⁻⁶)/0.10 ≈ 0.2697 J
  • U₂₃ = k q₂ q₃ / r = (8.99 × 10⁹)(2 × 10⁻⁶)(3 × 10⁻⁶)/0.10 ≈ 0.5394 J

Total work W = U₁₂ + U₁₃ + U₂₃ ≈ 0.1798 + 0.2697 + 0.5394 = 0.9889 J ≈ 0.99 J.

Problem 5.3 – Speed of an Accelerated Electron

An electron initially at rest is accelerated through a potential difference of 5 kV. Find its final speed.

Solution: Use energy conservation: loss in electric potential energy equals gain in kinetic energy.

ΔU = qΔV = (–e)(5 000 V) = –(1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹)(5 000) J = –8.01 × 10⁻¹⁶ J.

The magnitude of energy gained is 8.01 × 10⁻¹⁶ J.

Set kinetic energy K = ½ m v² equal to this:

½ (9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg) v² = 8.01 × 10⁻¹⁶ J → v² = (2 × 8.01 × 10⁻¹⁶) / (9.11 × 10⁻³¹) ≈ 1.76 × 10¹⁵ → v ≈ 1.33 × 10⁸ m/s.

This is about 44 % of the speed of light; relativistic corrections would be needed for higher accuracies, but the non‑relativistic result illustrates the principle.

Problem‑Solving Tips

  • Always identify whether you need potential (scalar) or field (vector). Use superposition for potentials directly; for fields, add vectorially.
  • When calculating work or energy, remember that moving a charge against the field increases its potential energy, while moving with the field decreases it.
  • Equipotential surfaces are invaluable for visualizing fields: draw them first, then sketch field lines perpendicular to them.
  • Check units: potential in volts, energy in joules (or eV), electric field in V/m or N/C.
  • For problems involving multiple steps (e.g., assemble a configuration), break the process into sequential steps and sum the contributions.
  • Summary

    In this chapter we have defined electric potential difference as work per unit charge and derived the potential of a point charge. We introduced electric potential energy for charge pairs and for a charge in a potential, highlighted the electron‑volt as a convenient energy unit, and explored equipotential surfaces and their geometric and physical properties. The potential gradient was shown to be the negative of the electric field, linking the scalar potential to the vector field. Numerous examples and problem‑solving strategies illustrated how these concepts are applied in typical electrostatic scenarios. Mastery of these topics provides a strong foundation for further study of capacitors, dielectrics, and electric circuits.